Via The Chicago Tribune…
|Sharon Smiley, of Chicago, won her fight for unemployment benefits after she as fired for doing extra work during her lunch break. (Chris Sweda, Chicago Tribune / January 12, 2012)
By Steve Schmadeke, Chicago Tribune reporterJanuary 16, 2012
Growing up on the South Side, Sharon Smiley was taught by her father that success comes from hard work, and he demonstrated that truth over 47 years as a railroad worker.
But when Smiley put that principle into practice, she was fired — for the first time in her life — from a receptionist job she had held for a decade.
Her offense? Voluntarily doing extra work one day during her lunch break.
Not only was Smiley fired, but the realty company she worked for challenged her unemployment benefits, saying she was guilty of misconduct and insubordination. Smiley says several lawyers declined to take her case, telling her she was bound to lose, so she represented herself.
Now, after almost two years at the brink of financial ruin, Smiley, 48, says she is basking in blessings.
In December, after months spent driving all over the area to fill temp jobs and cooking up soup or beef stew to help bring in tips at a Saturday daytime bartending job, Smiley was hired as a full-time receptionist at a downtown advertising firm.
And last week, an appeals court found that the state’s denial of her unemployment benefits was “clearly erroneous,” upholding a Cook County judge’s earlier ruling.
Though Smiley had begun receiving the benefits since the lower court’s Nov. 17, 2010, ruling — about nine months after she was fired — she would have been required to repay the money if a higher court ruled against her.
“I just didn’t think I was going to see the light,” she said last week at her south suburban Riverdale home. Smiley has been working full time since age 19, when she left college to support her young son.
Her descent to the edge of financial ruin started in January 2010. She had decided not to eat lunch that day, and because another manager assigned her extra work, Smiley wanted to finish it.
“I thought, ‘Well, I’m not hungry; I’ll just do this work … so when I get back from lunch, I can do my original work that I’m supposed to be doing,’ ” she said.
Smiley said her new boss had been assigning her more and more work, which she thought was an attempt to force her resignation. But she needed the job and just worked harder, she said. Still, the added stress contributed to a stroke, Smiley testified at her 2010 unemployment hearing.
On this day, a new manager told her she needed to take her break. Both sides agreed that this was the first time Smiley worked during lunch, records show.
Smiley told her manager that she had already punched out but wanted to finish the extra work because she thought her break time was her own.
“I asked her how she had taken a break when she remained sitting at the desk, answering phones and working on a spreadsheet,” the manager testified.
Smiley testified: “I would call myself, you know, being considerate (for) doing the work for someone else on my lunchtime, and I didn’t think it was going to be a problem.”
Smiley’s boss then told her to go speak with the company’s human resources director. The HR director testified that Smiley interrupted her during a four-minute meeting that concluded with Smiley being fired.
“It was just so unbelievable,” Smiley said. “It was a total horror story.”
The company,Equity Lifestyle Properties Inc., said it was trying to follow regulations, also written in its employee handbook, that require employees to take a break. A woman answering the phone at the company Friday declined to make anyone available or take a message about the case.
Companies can be held liable if employees are working during mandatory lunch breaks and supervisors know about it, said Martin Malin, a professor at the Illinois Institute of Technology‘s Chicago-Kent College of Law. Malin also heads the law school’s Institute for Law and the Workplace.
The issue typically arises when an employee sues a company for unpaid overtime under labor or minimum-wage laws, he said, and there is great variability in how each case is handled.
“The law is pretty clear in principle but hazy in application,” he said.
But those legal issues were never raised in Smiley’s case. The courts also haven’t been asked to rule whether Smiley’s firing was proper. Employment in Illinois generally is considered to be at the will of the employer, who does not need cause to fire workers.
In this case, the issue was strictly whether Smiley’s actions were misconduct and insubordination, which could disqualify her from unemployment benefits. A Cook County judge and appellate panel found that they weren’t.
Smiley quickly fell behind on her mortgage, property taxes and utility bills.
When people complimented her on her weight loss, she didn’t tell them she couldn’t afford groceries. She worried about losing her home and destroying any chance her daughter — who Smiley said earns all A’s at Bradley University — had of obtaining loans for law school.
Smiley said her Chicago church, Compassion Baptist, helped her keep her home, paying some of her bills and providing emotional and prayer support.
Pastor Austin Smith said Smiley worked hard to keep her head above water and find a new job. He said the circumstances of her job loss — being fired for doing extra work — only made her current success more satisfying.
“It’s not all bad news,” Smith said. “People get through tough times. Even in this economy, you only need one job. You have to believe there is one job out there for you.”
Smiley appealed the state’s denial of benefits to Cook County courts. On the day her appeal went before Cook County Judge Sanjay Tailor, Smiley was 10th in line, she said. The first nine appeals were denied, but Tailor granted hers, finding her actions didn’t rise to the level of misconduct.
“I said to myself, ‘Did he just say he’s going to award me my unemployment?’ ” Smiley said. “My eyes got big and got watery … but I didn’t let any tears fall.”
Smiley said she left a message afterward for one of the lawyers who had turned down her case.
“I said, ‘This is Sharon Smiley, and I just wanted to call and let you know that I did win my case, and I did it on my own.’ ”
Even better, she said, was the moment last month when she told her church supporters at a Bible study that she had found full-time work.
“Everyone just stood up and clapped for me,” she said. “Everybody was giving me hugs and telling me congratulations and everything.”
Hello London! The Jason Rosenberg Show is looking for an outlet over in LONDON! Currently we are heard all over the United States and looking for a station to air us in the good old UK! I’d love to live there too! Call 312.525.0014…
The Jason Rosenberg Show Is On All Of The Following Outlets…
We are very proud to announce here at The Biggest News we have reached 76,255 page views just this month alone bringing our grand total up to 302,053! Our end goal is to be one of the top viewed blogs in the United states. Currently we are according to Alexa( Traffic Rank in US: 177,004) top viewed website out of all of the millions if not billions of websites in the United States. The lower the number the higher the traffic ranking. We are honored! Our goal is to be # 1!
Yesterday was my sisters 32nd birthday party and I wanted it to be a good time, but I knew it probably wouldn’t!
For the past few days I’ve been dealing with a terrible toothache, and I didn’t believe in the Tooth Fairy until yesterday!
BTW, here is what was served at my sisters Birthday BBQ!
Then came the the booze and pain killers for me to try and stop the pain!
When that didn’t work I decided to call the best Dentist in the Country, Dr. Jason Crescenzo, AKA my “Tooth Fairy” according to me! He came out at 10pm just for me!
First, I happily arrived at his office!
Next, here I am getting ready for the root canal. I’ve never been so happy to be in a Dentists office, let alone get a root canal!